Faulk downplays Stafford’s acheivements

Detroit Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford had an impressive season. He passed for 5,038 yards, 41 touchdowns, led the Lions to 10 wins and the playoffs, and won the NFL’s comeback player of the year award. Mighty fine for someone the missed a good portion of his first two seasons.

Former St. Louis Ram and current NFL Network analyst Marshall Faulk doesn’t see Stafford’s accomplishments as a big deal. Instead Faulk said he wasn’t impressed and called passing for 5,000 yards is the norm in today’s NFL.

“Throwing for 5,000 yards in the NFL right now is nothing,” Faulk said. “I don’t want to take anything away from it. As much as people throw the football now, you better have 5,000 (yards) if you have Calvin Johnson.”      

I’d like to ask what is Faulk smoking? The 5,000 yard plateau has only been done five times in NFL history and he calls it the norm? Drew Bledsoe had over 600 pass attempts on four occasions and never broke 5,000 yards. If you take away Calvin Johnson, Stafford still passes for about 3,500 yards and 25 touchdowns. Still not that bad.

While I don’t know that Faulk has an agenda, it’s clear he’s been dining on paint chips. Stafford’s season is absolutely impressive. It’s not run of the mill, even in this pass-happy league.

I imagine this was a classic case of overstatement. From what I can gather, without having seen him make the statement, his point was that it’s not a big deal to throw for 5,000 yards, as it was in Marino’s day. If that’s what he meant, fine. I totally agree. It used to be a big deal to rush for 1,000 yards; it’s not a huge statement any longer.

On the other hand, if Faulk is trying to dismiss Stafford’s season altogether as somehow being par for the course, he has no leg to stand on. Jon Kitna had Calvin Johnson at his disposal. Peyton Manning, Daunte Culpepper, Joe Montana and MANY others had outstanding receivers at their disposal. It’s not to say Stafford is the greatest thing since sliced bread, rather that he had a fantastic season, regardless of era or weapons. 

Marshall Faulk won’t cut Jeff Fisher any slack

Marshall Faulk is one of the greatest St. Louis Rams of all time. If there were a Mr. Ram, he might be it. He won a Super Bowl with the Rams and was the centerpiece of “The Greatest Show On Turf”. During media day at Super Bowl XLVI in Indianapolis, Faulk was made available to talk to media and he gave his thoughts on the state of the Rams and former head coach Mike Martz. To say the least Faulk isn’t thrilled with the Rams and isn’t willing to cut new coach Jeff Fisher any slack despite his track record with the Tennessee Titans.    

• Faulk on Fisher: No. 28 expects quick results and doesn’t seem inclined to give Fisher the benefit of the doubt if the Rams’ reconstruction takes longer than expected.

“We’ll see. That’s all I can say. We will see,” Faulk said. “Jeff had a long and illustrious tenure in Tennessee and Houston. How long is (owner) Stan Kroenke going to wait? Will they give him all five years regardless of how bumpy it is? If Jeff hits three of those 8-8 seasons, what do you do? That’s a lot of money to be mediocre. You’ve got to deliver.”

• Faulk on Brian Schottenheimer: “I’m sorry, but can you tell me what Schottenheimer did with the Jets that would give confidence that he can be the one to turn this offense around and to get (quarterback) Sam Bradford going? He had better talent to work with in New York than he’ll have right away in St. Louis. So we’ll see what he can get done.”

• Faulk on the future of the Rams’ franchise: Is he worried that the team will move? “No, I’m not,” he said.

• Does Faulk believe the Rams will stay in St. Louis? “I hope so. I hope that’s the case. I would hate to see the city without the team,” he said.

• Faulk on the retirement of Mike Martz, his former head coach in St. Louis: “I know that he has a lot to offer. It’s bad that he takes a knock for being a passing guy, when you look at today’s NFL. And what he did and how we did it — that’s what everybody’s doing right now.”

• Faulk defending Martz’s work as offensive coordinator in Chicago: “Martz was working with lesser talent than he’s accustomed to working with. And I believe that (in the 2010 season) they were playing in the NFC championship, at home, against the Packers. With Caleb Hanie in the game after Jay Cutler went down. And they were in the game. If he didn’t do a good job, they should have let him go then. Other than (running back) Matt Forte, there wasn’t anyone that was fear inducing. I’m defending Mike because I can only imagine how hard it was to game plan with what he had. Look at what Green Bay put on the field offensively. Look at what Detroit put on the field offensively. And you have to play them twice a year? Do your best. And I believe he did his best.”

Faulk shouldn’t talk down about Fisher. He had a good run in Tennessee and almost beat the team Faulk played for in the Super Bowl. I can understand if the Rams hired anyone without a track record like Fisher’s. Granted he could’ve done more in Tennessee, but some of those seasons the Titans overachieved. In my opinion, the Rams made the best hire this offseason.   The way it sounds is that Faulk would likje to have someone that coaches an offensive style of football with a lot of run and gun.